|
VIA FAX
November 30th, 2006
To: The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
RE: Warman VS
Melissa Guille and The Canadian Heritage Alliance
Dear sirs,
I’d like to make
the following submission into the record as an interested party in these
proceedings.
Having been
apprised of the complaint, I’d like to suggest the following disposition
to this case:
1)
I think Ms. Guille should be persuaded to disallow any
postings on the board of her website should
she deem them inappropriate in style or content resulting from this.
2)
The most severe sanctions that should flow from this
hearing would be a very specific order, to desist
from allowing postings that lack adequate regard for the rules of
intelligent expression.
3)
No one should ever threaten a well meaning soul like
Melissa with the harsh penalties that seem to
loom over other cases in this field of interest. It would be cruel and
inane to have this gal labour
under such apprehensions a moment longer. Discussion is always the
answer to resolution when
dealing with reasonable folk. And I can certainly say that Melissa is
altogether exactly such a person!
4) The
Human Rights Board will never have any credibility as long as it seeks
to stifle intelligent
discussion regarding the conduct and desirability of whatever groups
exist in our space here.
To go so far as to reject truth as “no defence” is a rather inane and
yes indeed an evil disposition
to have perpetrated on a civilized being. As such I think you will
certainly be out of this business
in due course. I am working to see that this does in fact occur in this
country as the agenda that
appears quite clearly here is one that smacks of self interest with
regard to protecting those
guilty of whatever would hold them in disregard, contempt or suspicion
by right minded folk
who are entitled to be vigilant and to seek changes for the improvement
of our conduct as a society
on the whole. As long as you hold otherwise, you are in an incompetent
position to sit in judgement
of what Melissa should be allowed to express with respect to ideas. You
have to be wiling to allow
rightness or accept that there is no legitimacy to your approach. I do
not say this lightly,
I think it is just that simple.
5)
Warman does not strike me personally as the type that is
above victimizing women as Melissa is being
done to here. To make a living from seeking to gain press for no other
reason than semantic objections
to legitimate expression based on nothing more than political
correctness is a disposition that I believe
should be discouraged. I say give this man no more press in this area.
He has no further business here.
All activities in
this area should be well meaning, intelligent and Christianly
defensible. Anything else should
be discouraged and sanctioned appropriately with an order to cease and
desist. Additional penalties can
only be considered in good conscience if these conditions have all been
rejected outright and there is therefore
a lack of a suitable alternative for resolution in the interests of true
justice.
Signed,
Michael Chessman
Leader- Euro
British Coalition
http://www.britishcanada.org
CC Ms. Melissa
Guille
& Press Release
|